Yesterday I successfully tried my hand a new skill. I made paneer, an Indian cheese that you often get in vegetarian Indian dishes over here. I'd never seen it in the UK, but I guess you get it there too. And it's easy! Takes an hour or two, but was surprisingly easy. You just boil 2 litres of milk, take it off the heat, add three or four tablespoons of lemon juice, leave it over a gentle heat whilst stirring for half a minute, til the curds crash out of solution then filter it through a coarse weave piece of cotton in a colinder. Once it's cooled down a bit, you squeeze as much of the water out as you can, then wrap it in the cotton, put it between two plates, and put a big saucepan of water on to press it. Leave it pressing for an hour, then unwrap and use it in your favourite curry instead of meat. Easy!
And since I've recently learned something of the chemistry of cheesemaking, I'll share the following interesting fact. Milk has all the proteins dissolved (well, suspended is more the word) in solution because it's at just the right pH to dissolve them. If you change the pH (eg by adding acidic lemon juice) they are protonated to insoluble forms and crash out as curds which you use to make the cheese. Sometimes it's surprising how long you can study a subject without knowing basic chemistry of real life stuff. Oh well. Hedumacation, eh?!
Well, off to read some exciting chemistry papers now. On nice inaccessible things like spirobisnaphthalene synthesis. Hope ya'll are well. By the way Little Miss Sunshine is a good movie.
Addendum: I must point out that most cheese is not made by changing pH, they add rennet which is a mixture of enzymes usually taken from calf stomachs (but also available from vegetarian approved sources) which cuts the main milk protein into two, an insoluble half (which forms the cheese) and a soluble half which is washed away.
29 July 2007
20 July 2007
ANABELLAMIDE!!!!
That's right my friends - anabellamide! I have my very own natural product! Spelt a bit dodgy, but that's ok; poor ol guys at University College of Science, Calcutta, must have just been havin a bad spelling day. Best of all, I get to put it into my thesis cos its got N-benzoyl groups!Bet none of you losers have got your own natural products! HAHAHAHAHA!!!
17 July 2007
Thesis procrastination
How I'd like to write my thesis:
"It was pretty wierd that the NMR showed something completely different to what HPLC said, but since the HPLC said what I wanted to it to, I just ignored the NMR results."
What I have to write in my thesis:
"Analysis of HPLC and NMR data shows conflicting results. Rationalisation of this observation is as follows....."
If anyone can rationalise my conflicting results, please feel free to let me know. In the meantime I'm gonna tell you about my tramp on the weekend!
Me and Sean decided to (almost) get out of town and climb Mt Herbert on Saturday. Thought I'd show ya'll a couple of photos. Mt Herbert is the highest point on banks peninsula which is the remnants of a volcano which Christchurch is right next to. We drove to Lyttelton and took the boat across to diamond harbour. (by the way, e and m, we did consider dragging you guys with us, but since we only came up with the idea late on friday, it seemed a bit short notice!)
Turns out Mt Herbert is somewhat higher than it looked. I foolishly claimed to be able to see the top, but the top turned out to be very much in the clouds. Was a good walk, took about 6 hours and 2 days for my legs to recover. You walk through sheep fields most of the way which is pretty, and you pretty soon give up trying to avoid poo. The last third or so was in the cloud. It hadn't been snowing up there but ice had formed mental shapes on one side of everything, including tussock - giving some cool ice finger shapes.
Hopefully we'll do it again sometime so we can see what is apparently great views, with Akaroa on one side and Lyttelton on the other. (and maybe that time, e and m and ?, we'll come haul your asses up there with us - so the D2 engine can show us what it's made of!)
Nice boat on the crazy blue water in Lyttelton harbour
Typical tourist shot
Port Hills with Lyttelton
Meeting locals...
Cool ice formations
Well earned
"It was pretty wierd that the NMR showed something completely different to what HPLC said, but since the HPLC said what I wanted to it to, I just ignored the NMR results."
What I have to write in my thesis:
"Analysis of HPLC and NMR data shows conflicting results. Rationalisation of this observation is as follows....."
If anyone can rationalise my conflicting results, please feel free to let me know. In the meantime I'm gonna tell you about my tramp on the weekend!
Me and Sean decided to (almost) get out of town and climb Mt Herbert on Saturday. Thought I'd show ya'll a couple of photos. Mt Herbert is the highest point on banks peninsula which is the remnants of a volcano which Christchurch is right next to. We drove to Lyttelton and took the boat across to diamond harbour. (by the way, e and m, we did consider dragging you guys with us, but since we only came up with the idea late on friday, it seemed a bit short notice!)
Turns out Mt Herbert is somewhat higher than it looked. I foolishly claimed to be able to see the top, but the top turned out to be very much in the clouds. Was a good walk, took about 6 hours and 2 days for my legs to recover. You walk through sheep fields most of the way which is pretty, and you pretty soon give up trying to avoid poo. The last third or so was in the cloud. It hadn't been snowing up there but ice had formed mental shapes on one side of everything, including tussock - giving some cool ice finger shapes.
Hopefully we'll do it again sometime so we can see what is apparently great views, with Akaroa on one side and Lyttelton on the other. (and maybe that time, e and m and ?, we'll come haul your asses up there with us - so the D2 engine can show us what it's made of!)
Nice boat on the crazy blue water in Lyttelton harbour
Typical tourist shot
Port Hills with Lyttelton
Meeting locals...
...who are just enjoying the view
Cool ice formations
Nice day for it.
Glorious views of Akaroa
Well earned
13 July 2007
A little respite
As quite rightly pointed out by my dearest Miss G, this blog has become very serious of late. I think it's high time for a little lightening of the tone, so I took some photos of the ol kittens, cos lets face it, kittens cheer EVERYONE up!
We've been having plenty of adventures with them recently, cos it's been ridiculously cold over here the last week or two (-6 C frosts and hardly above zero all day at times). And what with grey's little bald patch, we've let them stay in most nights. And such things give you a great deal of insight into cat habits. Such as the somewhat surprising penchant for muffins. Apple muffins to be accurate. I'd left some fresh muffins on the kitchen table, well covered, but they managed to pull one off (very naughty - we've been trying to train them off the table, obviously). I noticed soon after, but since it was wasted anyway I thought I'd let them keep it, expecting them to give it a bit of a lick (guess they like the buttery smell). A couple of minutes later I wandered back and...nothing but a couple of crumbs left! Turns out kittens will demolish entire muffins! And kittens don't get sugar highs (thank God, they're bad enough without being high), they just crash out in a daze for a few hours! At least muffins contain a reasonable amount of butter; they've since polished off several slices of bread when left unattended! And we have started feeding them now, so they're not just starving or anything - they just like baked products! Wierdos. I need to explain 'carnivore' to them sometime, obviously.
Here's a couple more photos of em taken over the last wee while.
On a cold night, they both got tucked up in Sean's coat - super adorable!
We've been having plenty of adventures with them recently, cos it's been ridiculously cold over here the last week or two (-6 C frosts and hardly above zero all day at times). And what with grey's little bald patch, we've let them stay in most nights. And such things give you a great deal of insight into cat habits. Such as the somewhat surprising penchant for muffins. Apple muffins to be accurate. I'd left some fresh muffins on the kitchen table, well covered, but they managed to pull one off (very naughty - we've been trying to train them off the table, obviously). I noticed soon after, but since it was wasted anyway I thought I'd let them keep it, expecting them to give it a bit of a lick (guess they like the buttery smell). A couple of minutes later I wandered back and...nothing but a couple of crumbs left! Turns out kittens will demolish entire muffins! And kittens don't get sugar highs (thank God, they're bad enough without being high), they just crash out in a daze for a few hours! At least muffins contain a reasonable amount of butter; they've since polished off several slices of bread when left unattended! And we have started feeding them now, so they're not just starving or anything - they just like baked products! Wierdos. I need to explain 'carnivore' to them sometime, obviously.
Here's a couple more photos of em taken over the last wee while.
On a cold night, they both got tucked up in Sean's coat - super adorable!
Comfort levels - very high.
11 July 2007
Scientific community take matters into their own hands.
I spent far too much time today trying to get hold of the original source, but failed miserably. But I still want to highlight this story, and hopefully come back with some real data or at least knowledgable commentary when I get my hands on the RS publication.
The BBC did an article on the release of a study which should apparently finally put the nail in the coffin of the sunspot theory trumpeted by "The Great Global Warming Swindle" swindle (grrrrrrr....). I like the study author's comment: "All the graphs they showed stopped in about 1980, and I knew why, because things diverged after that, ...you can't just ignore bits of data that you don't like"
The story's covered by the BBC and the Guardian. Nice to see that the scientific community won't put up with the media willfully abusing them. It's one thing to give the other side of the story, quite another to make stuff up when the other side of the story is vanishingly small. Basic premise of the show - bash the naughty, apparently money-grabbing climatologists. And of course all those poor defenceless oil companies, with no money to research their defence. People complain that there's not enough evidence that global warming is happening, so money gets put into research to look for it. But apparently now that they're getting lots of evidence, all that (minuscule amount, comparatively) money is going to their heads and their integrity must now be questioned.
Several major scientific organisations have pointed out that the program adjusted data, misrepresented some of those interviewed, presented antiquated and discredited data as new, and even told outright lies (eg volcanos produce 100 times less CO2 than human activities, not more, as claimed). And unfortunately, the story panders to the audience's desire to ignore the problem.
So anyway, this was supposed to be a quick post, I wasn't planning to bash the GGWS! It just came out cos it annoyed me SO MUCH!! Anyone who has no idea what I'm talking about (ie anyone in NZ, I guess) can get a copy of the show from me, if you're interested.
The BBC did an article on the release of a study which should apparently finally put the nail in the coffin of the sunspot theory trumpeted by "The Great Global Warming Swindle" swindle (grrrrrrr....). I like the study author's comment: "All the graphs they showed stopped in about 1980, and I knew why, because things diverged after that, ...you can't just ignore bits of data that you don't like"
The story's covered by the BBC and the Guardian. Nice to see that the scientific community won't put up with the media willfully abusing them. It's one thing to give the other side of the story, quite another to make stuff up when the other side of the story is vanishingly small. Basic premise of the show - bash the naughty, apparently money-grabbing climatologists. And of course all those poor defenceless oil companies, with no money to research their defence. People complain that there's not enough evidence that global warming is happening, so money gets put into research to look for it. But apparently now that they're getting lots of evidence, all that (minuscule amount, comparatively) money is going to their heads and their integrity must now be questioned.
Several major scientific organisations have pointed out that the program adjusted data, misrepresented some of those interviewed, presented antiquated and discredited data as new, and even told outright lies (eg volcanos produce 100 times less CO2 than human activities, not more, as claimed). And unfortunately, the story panders to the audience's desire to ignore the problem.
So anyway, this was supposed to be a quick post, I wasn't planning to bash the GGWS! It just came out cos it annoyed me SO MUCH!! Anyone who has no idea what I'm talking about (ie anyone in NZ, I guess) can get a copy of the show from me, if you're interested.
09 July 2007
Live Earth Complainers Part 2
After my ramble last night, I've managed to figure out the thing that annoys me and have finally managed to form a succinct point! I dislike the fact that complaining about live earth is a self-fullfilling argument. By that I mean that if everyone decides Live Earth is deeply uncool, then yes, it will be a complete waste of time. If, however, people get behind it, ignore all the little 'oh concerts for causes is SOOOO last season' losers, just enjoy it and get into the spirit of it, maybe it will actually be a success and help get the ball rolling.
So yeah. I really am done now!
So yeah. I really am done now!
08 July 2007
Live Earth Complainers
Well, I hate to be a bore, but this is MY blog and I get to say my bit! I have heard from quite a few people recently that Live Earth is just a way for a whole bunch of celebrities in their private jets to feel good about themselves and organise a wasteful environmentally unfriendly waste-of-time festival. And I'm getting more annoyed about it the more people say it.
There seem to be a number of misconceptions about the festival. For a start, those who watched will have noticed that many of the artists who performed weren't in their home countries. That's because they were asked to play at the concert they were closest to. So most won't have had to fly more than an hour or so and many won't have flown at all. The website for the event had a great deal of information on it for how to get to the venues by public transport to help the audience avoid using cars and planes. And besides, if it wasn't this gig, the venues involved would all have had some other major concert going on anyway. Do you seriously reckon if these gigs didn't happen they would have closed Wembley for the weekend and planted trees over it instead? I don't think so.
It has been shown that these sort of events can raise awareness, to the extent that much needed change actually happens. After all it was just after Live 8 that a great deal of debt was cancelled for the poorest countries in the world, giving them a chance to start again and improve their lot. On that occasion about all people were being asked to do was write a quick letter to dear ol Tony. Unfortunately this time they're being asked to actually think about their own lives, find those areas where they are being wasteful and trying to tighten the belts a little. I don't think you'll ever hear Al Gore suggesting we all have to live by candlelight and ban all vehicles. We only have to make small changes, but we have to all do it. But of course until we're actually screwed and we have to squeeze into the last little band of the earth that's still hospitable, everyone prefers the ostrich position. Nice and easy huh? And if, as seems to be popular, the media tells us that actually it's all just a hoax (which they say is in the interest of giving both sides of the story) using misrepresented data and outright lies (don't get me started on The Great Global Warming Swindle!) only panders to our desire to ignore the possibility that we are shooting ourselves in the foot unnecessarily.
Now I don't want to debate whether climate change is really going to happen and/or happening. Cos I just don't know. Of course the number of scientists whose data and models all agree on climate change (and have done for 20 or 30 years) provides compelling evidence, but the major problem with this issue is that we just won't know for SURE until it's too late. I really don't understand what is wrong with using precautionary tactics. Some people compare the precautionary policy to the absurd concept of "pre-emptive war", but this is a bad and dangerous analogy, since war necessarily involves violence, death and environmental damage. The only thing needed to solve this potential problem is to tame our rampant desire to consume. As such, a 'pre-emptive war' on climate change is a much more wholesome beast. People claim that there's no point in each of us making an effort as long as china is still growing and polluting, but they forget that the main market for what China produce is US - half the time buying pieces of tat that we don't even need. And making these small changes will have other benefits - if you cycle to and from work each day you'll feel healthier and happier (as I now do since I made the change) and that way you won't have to pay to drive to the gym, then pay when you get there to run on an electronic treadmill. So saving the planet saves you money too! (not to mention your cheaper electricity bill)
One small point on the lack of consensus on if climate change is really happening, though: go turn your engine on, and sit down next to the exhaust pipe for a few minutes. What do you think? Does that smell like good, wholesome, natural goodness? Even if you don't believe in climate change, surely you'd have to agree that that air isn't good air. Not the life-giving, healthy stuff we like to breath, huh? So really, would it be that bad to minimise it - even if there is no such thing as climate change?
At the moment most of the debate for stopping climate change revolves around 'how can we produce electricity with less CO2 emissions?'. This sort of question is clearly very important (and as usual ol Georgie has set his heart on arguably the worst of all the options). But first and foremost, the easiest thing to do is just use less.
To return to Live 8 it is important to remember that poverty and climate change are linked. Our reliance on oil fans the flames of most major problems facing our society. Many wars (both outright and subversive) have been fought over 'strategic resource management' and many of these wars promote extreme counterreactions like terrorism. Usually the discovery of oil in a third world country does not cause the growth and development of that country; it throws them into turmoil. And realistically if climate change turns out to be true it will be the poorest countries that will be least able to adapt and will suffer the most.
I was, therefore, horrified to hear that Bob Geldof is one of the chief amongst the Live Earth complainers. Get this quote from our great saviour, Mr Geldof: "I would only organize Live Earth if I could go on stage and announce concrete environmental measures from the American presidential candidates, Congress or major corporations. They haven't got those guarantees, so it's just an enormous pop concert. ... I hope they're a success. But why is Gore actually organizing them? To make us aware of the greenhouse effect? Everybody's known about that problem for years. We are all [expletive] conscious of global warming."
Riiiiiiiiiight. I don't remember the bit of Live Aid when Bob got on stage and announced 'it's ok everyone; George, Tony and the boys have agreed to give all those poor people a few quid, so you can all go home now'. As I recall it was 'just an enormous pop concert'...which managed to generate awareness and force change. And dude, seriously, YOU organised the one twenty years before...we are all [expletive] conscious of poor African children. I'd say Bono was pretty conspicuous in his absence at Live Earth too. Seems like sour grapes to me - throwing their toys cos someone else found a cause too.
So anyway. I should close this rant and congratulate those of you who reached the end of such an ill-constructed and train-of-thought hodgepodge of ideas. All those of you who did will receive a free chocolate fish (those in the UK can have a rolo instead) for making it. Claim your prize next time you see me! Feel free to write abusive comments if you think I'm talking rubbish and if you can convince me, you'll get a bonus chocolate fish!
PS I must say, some of Live Earth did get on my nerves and some of those videos were particularly over the top. It also seemed like it was mix and matching different issues rather than concentrating on the main one. Plus I'm not convinced that changing lightbulbs alone is the answer (which is the impression the sum of those videos gave me), personally I'd suggest the humvees and Ford 25o's might have a little bit to do with it too. Although that video with Prunella Scales was genius! Anyone who can tell me who the guy in it was also gets a bonus chocolate fish!
There seem to be a number of misconceptions about the festival. For a start, those who watched will have noticed that many of the artists who performed weren't in their home countries. That's because they were asked to play at the concert they were closest to. So most won't have had to fly more than an hour or so and many won't have flown at all. The website for the event had a great deal of information on it for how to get to the venues by public transport to help the audience avoid using cars and planes. And besides, if it wasn't this gig, the venues involved would all have had some other major concert going on anyway. Do you seriously reckon if these gigs didn't happen they would have closed Wembley for the weekend and planted trees over it instead? I don't think so.
It has been shown that these sort of events can raise awareness, to the extent that much needed change actually happens. After all it was just after Live 8 that a great deal of debt was cancelled for the poorest countries in the world, giving them a chance to start again and improve their lot. On that occasion about all people were being asked to do was write a quick letter to dear ol Tony. Unfortunately this time they're being asked to actually think about their own lives, find those areas where they are being wasteful and trying to tighten the belts a little. I don't think you'll ever hear Al Gore suggesting we all have to live by candlelight and ban all vehicles. We only have to make small changes, but we have to all do it. But of course until we're actually screwed and we have to squeeze into the last little band of the earth that's still hospitable, everyone prefers the ostrich position. Nice and easy huh? And if, as seems to be popular, the media tells us that actually it's all just a hoax (which they say is in the interest of giving both sides of the story) using misrepresented data and outright lies (don't get me started on The Great Global Warming Swindle!) only panders to our desire to ignore the possibility that we are shooting ourselves in the foot unnecessarily.
Now I don't want to debate whether climate change is really going to happen and/or happening. Cos I just don't know. Of course the number of scientists whose data and models all agree on climate change (and have done for 20 or 30 years) provides compelling evidence, but the major problem with this issue is that we just won't know for SURE until it's too late. I really don't understand what is wrong with using precautionary tactics. Some people compare the precautionary policy to the absurd concept of "pre-emptive war", but this is a bad and dangerous analogy, since war necessarily involves violence, death and environmental damage. The only thing needed to solve this potential problem is to tame our rampant desire to consume. As such, a 'pre-emptive war' on climate change is a much more wholesome beast. People claim that there's no point in each of us making an effort as long as china is still growing and polluting, but they forget that the main market for what China produce is US - half the time buying pieces of tat that we don't even need. And making these small changes will have other benefits - if you cycle to and from work each day you'll feel healthier and happier (as I now do since I made the change) and that way you won't have to pay to drive to the gym, then pay when you get there to run on an electronic treadmill. So saving the planet saves you money too! (not to mention your cheaper electricity bill)
One small point on the lack of consensus on if climate change is really happening, though: go turn your engine on, and sit down next to the exhaust pipe for a few minutes. What do you think? Does that smell like good, wholesome, natural goodness? Even if you don't believe in climate change, surely you'd have to agree that that air isn't good air. Not the life-giving, healthy stuff we like to breath, huh? So really, would it be that bad to minimise it - even if there is no such thing as climate change?
At the moment most of the debate for stopping climate change revolves around 'how can we produce electricity with less CO2 emissions?'. This sort of question is clearly very important (and as usual ol Georgie has set his heart on arguably the worst of all the options). But first and foremost, the easiest thing to do is just use less.
To return to Live 8 it is important to remember that poverty and climate change are linked. Our reliance on oil fans the flames of most major problems facing our society. Many wars (both outright and subversive) have been fought over 'strategic resource management' and many of these wars promote extreme counterreactions like terrorism. Usually the discovery of oil in a third world country does not cause the growth and development of that country; it throws them into turmoil. And realistically if climate change turns out to be true it will be the poorest countries that will be least able to adapt and will suffer the most.
I was, therefore, horrified to hear that Bob Geldof is one of the chief amongst the Live Earth complainers. Get this quote from our great saviour, Mr Geldof: "I would only organize Live Earth if I could go on stage and announce concrete environmental measures from the American presidential candidates, Congress or major corporations. They haven't got those guarantees, so it's just an enormous pop concert. ... I hope they're a success. But why is Gore actually organizing them? To make us aware of the greenhouse effect? Everybody's known about that problem for years. We are all [expletive] conscious of global warming."
Riiiiiiiiiight. I don't remember the bit of Live Aid when Bob got on stage and announced 'it's ok everyone; George, Tony and the boys have agreed to give all those poor people a few quid, so you can all go home now'. As I recall it was 'just an enormous pop concert'...which managed to generate awareness and force change. And dude, seriously, YOU organised the one twenty years before...we are all [expletive] conscious of poor African children. I'd say Bono was pretty conspicuous in his absence at Live Earth too. Seems like sour grapes to me - throwing their toys cos someone else found a cause too.
So anyway. I should close this rant and congratulate those of you who reached the end of such an ill-constructed and train-of-thought hodgepodge of ideas. All those of you who did will receive a free chocolate fish (those in the UK can have a rolo instead) for making it. Claim your prize next time you see me! Feel free to write abusive comments if you think I'm talking rubbish and if you can convince me, you'll get a bonus chocolate fish!
PS I must say, some of Live Earth did get on my nerves and some of those videos were particularly over the top. It also seemed like it was mix and matching different issues rather than concentrating on the main one. Plus I'm not convinced that changing lightbulbs alone is the answer (which is the impression the sum of those videos gave me), personally I'd suggest the humvees and Ford 25o's might have a little bit to do with it too. Although that video with Prunella Scales was genius! Anyone who can tell me who the guy in it was also gets a bonus chocolate fish!
03 July 2007
Forgiven!
It would seem that all is forgiven! As soon as the kittens came out of their boxes from the vet they were all over us and desperate for some attention! They're even more affectionate than usual.
I had a laugh at the vet's suggestion that they avoid exerting themselves for 3 days - how on earth are we supposed to stop them flinging each other and any other inanimate object around for 3 days?! And sure enough, I've already had to break up a monster fight that was kicking off, and they've only been out of anaesthetic for 5 hours! Grey doesn't seem fussed about her cut, although I'm sure she's a bit miffed at the humiliation of wandering round with her new hairdo.
Uh oh, the tell-tale bangs and crashes. Better go check out who's winning the fight next door!
I had a laugh at the vet's suggestion that they avoid exerting themselves for 3 days - how on earth are we supposed to stop them flinging each other and any other inanimate object around for 3 days?! And sure enough, I've already had to break up a monster fight that was kicking off, and they've only been out of anaesthetic for 5 hours! Grey doesn't seem fussed about her cut, although I'm sure she's a bit miffed at the humiliation of wandering round with her new hairdo.
Uh oh, the tell-tale bangs and crashes. Better go check out who's winning the fight next door!
02 July 2007
West coast trip
Thought I'd put up a couple of photos of me and Paul's trip to the west coast just before he headed back to the mothership. We went over to stay at my favourite NZ hostel - Te Nikau retreat. Hidden in amongst the rainforest in the middle of the back of beyond on the slightly crazy west coast. We took it easy over the Southern Alps and stopped off at Castle Hill (where they filmed large chunks of the chronicles of Narnia) wandering between the Maori sacred rocks. Then a chilled evening at a west coast pub, a couple of short walks through the rainforest and to the beach and the obligatory pancake rocks visit for the blowholes, which were in fine form and put on quite a show.
All in all a great weekend and nice to get out of town again.
By the way - anyone noticing a contradiction in my putting a whole bunch of photos of a roadtrip and a LiveEarth badge on my blog in one day should know it's the first time Norman's had a run out for ages, he hardly leaves his parking spot! But I hear you!
Castle Hill
Castle Hill
The main divide
Paul and Norman
He didn't pull that pose willingly!
Me n the bro at the beach on the west coast
All in all a great weekend and nice to get out of town again.
By the way - anyone noticing a contradiction in my putting a whole bunch of photos of a roadtrip and a LiveEarth badge on my blog in one day should know it's the first time Norman's had a run out for ages, he hardly leaves his parking spot! But I hear you!
Castle Hill
Castle Hill
The main divide
Paul and Norman
He didn't pull that pose willingly!
Me n the bro at the beach on the west coast
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)